Monday, January 25, 2016

"....Walk Out Of The Showroom Now.....Right Now...."

We could use a little more Jesus in the coming weeks.

But not so much in a hallelujah way.

More a "can you hear me now?" way.



WASHINGTON -- At a time when the media’s duty to vet candidates is more urgent than ever, journalism is giving Donald Trump a free pass, leading historian Doris Kearns Goodwin told The Huffington Post in an interview.


Trump deploys fame for fame’s sake; taps into populist expressions of fear, hatred and resentment and shows a knack for picking fights and a braggart’s focus on the horse race. All of which allow him to play into -- and exploit -- every media weakness and bad habit in a chase for audience and numbers.

As a result, said Goodwin, the 69-year-old Trump has preempted serious scrutiny of his past, character, record in business and suitability -- if any -- for the office of president.

In the old days Goodwin writes about, vetting (and probably dismissing) Trump would also have been the province of party leaders: prominent, experienced (though not necessarily wise) power brokers in politics, government, business and other upper realms of American society.

But the phrase “party leader” today is an oxymoron, and picking nominees today is totally the province of voters in caucuses and primaries, which makes the civic role of the mainstream press all that more important, Goodwin observed. 

“We in the media are the key purveyors of the qualities of the candidates and of telling people who they are and what they stand for,” said Goodwin, a Pulitzer Prize winner whose best-selling books on Lincoln, the Roosevelts and Lyndon B. Johnson include studies of their dealings with the press.

"The responsibilities are pretty great."

Is the press carrying out those responsibilities in the case of Trump?

“No. I don’t think so,” she said.

Every candidate is dealing with the same editorial and institutional trends: obsession with polls and conflict, the shorter attention spans of most news consumers and the ruthless aggregation, measurement and marketing of user interactions across scattered social media.

But no one uses these trends as cynically or successfully as Trump to avoid the scrutiny that only the media can provide and that the media, mesmerized, is not providing. 

“Every day he is a new story, which is brilliant in its own right,” said Goodwin. “We see him in a debate, yelling at an opponent, or making fun of somebody or saying something outrageous.”

The focus on conflict rivets attention on the present. And by constantly jabbering about polls and his chances, Trump also throws the focus on the unknowable (but cheap for the media to speculate about) future of the campaign. 

“It’s: ‘How is he going to do?,’” said Goodwin. “It’s: ‘How is this happening? Oh my God, he is leading! It’s possible he could win!’”

By dwelling on the glittering present and the entertainingly uncertain future, Trump erases all sense of history, context and accountability for his own life and actions.

“He doesn’t let you have time to go back to his past,” said Goodwin.

“Do we know, at this point, about his modus operandi in business? Do we know how he treated his staff? Do we know what kind of leader he was when he was building his business? I mean, I don’t know the answers to these things.

“All I know is that, when I see him now, it’s like his past is not being used by the media to tell us who the guy really is.”

No person in public life is more in need of deep investigative scrutiny than Trump, said Goodwin. But the best way to tell his story is through long, complex print pieces of a kind that most audience today have little patience for.

Writing about the late 19th century muckrakers, Goodwin gained an appreciation both for their methods -- they might take two years investigating an oil company -- and the patience of reform-minded readers of those times.

“The trouble today is, first of all, committing the resources, and then it would be a really complex story, and given people’s attention span, who would be reading it?

“And yet I have to say that print journalism is still much more able to tell a complicated story, not only because of length but because the way sentences work. It can’t be shorthanded.”

Trump has another tactic for defeating press scrutiny of the traditional kind, according to Goodwin. 

In his role as a celebrity brand, Trump isn’t selling a movement or a specific agenda, or even the details of his own track record.
He is selling his stage persona -- and the related notion that his supporters can somehow mimic him by voting for him. It’s a materialistic version of a religious appeal: the “prosperity gospel” of Norman Vincent Peale and Rev. Ike.

Or it’s like becoming another BeyoncĂ© by buying her lipstick. 

“It’s the idea that he’s ‘The One’ and that they can BECOME him,” said Goodwin. “You’re always looking for a leader who is going to have an impact on your life. I mean, it makes some sense. But in another way it makes no sense at all.”

Media amplifies the presumed power of Trump by conflating celebrity with clout and voters’ faith in an agenda with fan worship.

“Bernie Sanders is a movement; Trump is not a movement. What movement was he ever in? What movement is he in now?

“It’s just him. He’s saying ‘I am here and just somehow, I am going to make things good.’”

“We know enough about leadership to know that that is not true.”



A friend of mine posted the link to Huffington Post where he found this article. His posting included this insightful introduction.


Excellent ~ Doris Kearns Goodwin tells us exactly how we got to this point. There are two diverse groups who need to understand this: The Fourth Estate who will never admit to their complicity and the Trumpistas who will never take the time to read this or understand why this is wrong and who, perhaps, will also dismiss this as Establishment propaganda. It is alarming. 



From my seat in the peanut gallery, what resonates most clearly is the prediction of "Trumpistas" attitude.

Although I've personally referred to this unique and eclectic political demographic as "TrumpStumpers" and I believe the prevailing moniker assigned is "Trumpeters".

A buffoonish and dangerous demagogue by any other name, yada, yada.

I've doubled down the bet that

a) Trump's tooters will likely NOT take time to read any of this.

b) Trump's tooters, should they actually read any of this, will NOT understand why this is wrong

c) Trump's tooters WILL, bet the farm, dismiss this as "Establishment propaganda."

And that brings us around to the intent of this essay, and title of this collection of essays, I publish.

Politics in plain English.

Just on the off chance that some of the more obtuse of Donald's devotees happen to wander through here on the way to their daily dose of Michael Savage or Glenn Beck, let me offer the following easy-to-read, bullet point summary of what's going on here.

  • Donald Trump is that "city boy" at the dealership whose first question to you is "what are you looking for in a truck?"
  • Let's say that "something you're looking for" is dependability.
  • From then on, EVERY time you ask ANY question about a particular truck, he will find a way to word his answer so it focuses on how "dependable" that truck is.
  • Even though you know, deep down, that "dependability" is only ONE of the many things you want in a truck, he will keep you talking, and answering you, about dependability.
  • He's gambling that you're stupid enough to buy a truck ONLY because it's dependable.
  • Donald Trump is counting on you to be just that stupid.

You're not really that stupid, right?

Of course not.

He can try to talk to you like you're stupid all day long, but you know what he's up to and you can hear what he's trying to do.

And THAT, TrumpTruckers is why we need a little more Jesus in this presidential campaign.

Not in a hallelujah way.

But in a "can you hear me now?" way.

As in...

"....he who has ears to hear....let him hear...."

Otherwise, you're going to get stuck with a piece of shit truck because some city boy sold you on its dependability.

Depend on it.




No comments:

Post a Comment